Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Philosophy
Plato and Aristotle: Focus on the State
Home
Baha'i Day
Christian Science (day)
Hinduism (DAY)
Jainism (Day)
Jainism DAY(additional material)
Orthodox Judaism (DAY)
Roman Catholicism
Scientology (DAY)
Sunni Islam DAY
Wicca (DAY)
Amish
Baha'i
Buddhism
Dervish
Hinduism
Jainism
Orthodox Judaism
The Navaho
Russian Orthodox
Scientology
Shiite Islam
Taoism
Wicca
Plato and Aristotle: Focus on the State
Social Contract: Hume
Social Contract: Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes' Leviathan, Chapter 13
Thomas Hobbes' THE LEVIATHAN, chapter 17
Thomas Hobbes' THE LEVIATHAN, chapter 19
Social Contract: John Locke
Eco-Feminism: Val Plumwood
Communism: Marcuse

Plato and Aristotle, focus on Aristotle and the State



For both Plato and Aristotle, the state works in the interest of the common good. Plato's city-state is a well-defined structure in which all citizens neatly inhabit the niche to which they are best suited. In this plan, people stay true to their assigned niche; they very rarely move. Their tasks and lives are unchanging, but Aristotle questions this conception of an ideal, unchanging state. For Aristotle, the state is not fixed, but an on-going project. Most Americans believe in Aristotle's changeable state.

Aristotle's idea of the universal "good life" sees the human individual seeking of the good as part of the state seeking the good--the state and the individual are together in prosperity because the good state allows citizens to achieve the good life. Therefore, a state cannot be separated from the practical reality of the people who constitute it humans are inherently political/social (Aristotle's Politics) and are not niche-driven humans of Plato's Republic.

Aristotle does believe in idealism. All forms of organization are not equally valid. Rather, he argues that there are standards that are more right...more just. Nevertheless, these ideals must be balanced by what is possible. Artistotle argues: "We should consider, not only what form of government is best, but also what is possible and what is easily attainable by all" (Politics).



The task of implementing Plato's Republic would eventually lead to chaos; an excessive utopia could never be realized. But, equipped with the idea that all states are "works in progress," and various means of government may be used to achieve "the good," humans are happily seeking the good life. Plato's system is prescribed (and unattainable--a dream vision), while Aristotle's non-system allows humans to be involved in achieving the good state--the good state for them, and warns of the problems of the bad state--of how monarchy may devolve to tyranny, aristocracy may devolve to oligarchy, and polity may devolve to democracy. Therefore, Aristotle sees humans as active participants in the making of their own civic lives.



Aristotle's conception of the state is not egalitarian;all are not equal but rather some are better than others. He believes in individuality of those who, by personality, want to govern and those who, by personality, want to be led. However, the warning always exists that those who want to be led may grow to want to lead if they see/recognize an inequality of voice. Revolution springs from the desire of "lesser" men for equality.

Philosophy with dr.b